Nationals- Alex M Game

Discussion and analysis about a full game.

Nationals- Alex M Game

Postby Chexhero on Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:14 pm

It was quite an honor to play the world champion at this years nationals. He was dominating just about everyone and I had a goal to obtain 1 drawn ballot versus him. I achieved that the first ballot and almost obtained another draw the third game, but failed to do so thanks to a poorly played move in the beginning, and a losing move blunder at the end. Lets also credit a very strong game played by the champ.

9-14, 22-18, 10-15, 18-9, 5-14, 26-22 (25-22 is also strong and a line I know much better, but Alex has already put me on a line I have little experience playing) 15-18, 22-15, 11-18, 31-26, 8-11, 24-20, 6-10, 25-22, 18-25, 29-22, 3-8? (very questionable move and not a good choice, 4-8 and 2-6 are better alternatives. I thought hard about 2-6 but it looked very questionable and to risky) 28-24 (I was expecting Alex to squeeze with 22-18, but he waited with 28-24 which is a lot better and attempts to trap me up) 1-5, 22-17, which leads to this position.

Image


11-16 (11-15 looks like a loss after 23-19, 8-11, 26-22 but 2-6 actually forces a miracle draw, but there was no way I was looking for that and thought I had better chances with the 11-16 exchange) 20-11, 8-15, 26-22, 12-16 (pretty much forced) 23-19 ( 23-18 is not as strong as I could squeeze with 16-20 forcing 32-27 and now I can attack the piece on 24) 16-23, 27-11, 7-16, 24-20, 16-19, 20-16 leading to this interesting and critical position for red

Image

My first instinct was 6-9 because I think Alex was expecting 4-8 and new it would lose. I knew I had to do something good here. 4-8 does end up losing for red. 6-9, 16-11?
Here I go over another variation Alex had in mind and demonstrated earlier- 17-13 would allow 19-24 which looks very beneficial for red. But actually loses as follows! 16-11, 9-13 I thought this was the saving grace because it prevents 11-7 as shown below

Image

Now 30-26, 10-15, 26-23, 24-28 (24-27 loses by 23-19) 11-7, 4-8, 7-3, 8-11, 3-7, 11-16, and now 22-17, 13-22, 6-10 for a double fork win. Some very good endgame principles to be learned here. After the 17-13 earlier, 10-15 actually forces a tough bridge ending draw for red, but honestly, if Alex would have played 17-13, I would have gone 19-24 because I would have wanted to avoid the bridge.

After 16-11, 9-13, 32-27, 14-18, 22-6, 2-9, 11-7, 13-22, 21-17, 9-13, 17-14 (phew somehow I got out of that and now have a easy draw, no use thinking anymore! Who is this Alex guy anyway?)

Image

4-8, 7-3, 8-12?????, 3-7, 12-16, 30-26! and game over. Of course it had to be an in and out shot, I fall for them all the time and the second time it beat me in this tournament. 8-11 instead of 8-12 would have drew, but I made a careless rookie mistake by assuming the game was over and no win was possible. While I can say I just blew the game at the end, that really is not the truth. A bad move earlier on made this game very difficult to me and wore me out, I was tired and eventually it got to me at the end. While a good lesson here is to never let down your guard, I know I could have played this line a lot better. Well played by Alex and was one was my favorite games of the tournament.
Chexhero
 
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:11 pm
Location: PA

Re: Nationals- Alex M Game

Postby Alex_Moiseyev on Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:05 pm

Thanks for comments, Joe !

Yeaa ... I didn't miss anything in this game and after 5-9 both moves for white, 17-13 and 16-11, lead only to draw. After 17-13 game continues: 10-15, 13x6, 2x9 etc technical draw as you mentioned correctly. However I should definetely try this instead 16-11 ... hmmm ... only God really controls things in such cases and knows what is better among two drawn moves !

Rich and very instructive position ... true midgame masterpiece.

BTW. Did you realise that in position on diagram (see below) white has two ways to win:

1) 22-17, 13x22, 7-10

2) 23-18, 14x23, 7-11

Image

Alex
I am playing checkers, not chess.
User avatar
Alex_Moiseyev
 
Posts: 4082
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Nationals- Alex M Game

Postby Chexhero on Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:55 pm

Ah yes, I see it now. Not so hard to see that position loses for red, but when you are 15 to 20 or so moves behind it, it is not so obvious!
Chexhero
 
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:11 pm
Location: PA


Return to Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

class=