CONTEST #4

General Discussion about the game of Checkers.

Moderators: Alan Millhone, rich beckwith

CONTEST #4

Postby Bill Salot on Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:21 am

Because of a ballooning backlog of qualified contest compositions, the Unofficial World Championship Checker Problem Composing Contests are continuing back to back.

Because of an increasing corps of competent composers, Contest #4 now contains five (5) incredible concoctions cunningly crafted to shock the coolest combatant and confuse the occasional computer with the cavorting capers of kings at play.

Please go to the Contest Page at http://www.usacheckers.com/problems/show_contest.php, review the composers’ solutions, and vote for the problem you deem the best of these five. The polls close at midnight, May 27, 2012.

Bill Salot
Bill Salot
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:57 am

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby JohnAcker on Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:29 pm

Great to see the contest take off like this, Bill!
John Acker
ACF Treasurer
Director, 2013 National Tournament
JohnAcker
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:45 pm

in Escaped for prisioner there are 13 red checkers.....hmmm
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Bill Salot on Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:06 pm

Irma,

One of the beauties of problemathology is that its scope is broader and deeper than the game itself. Problems are not retricted to only settings that can arise in games.

By the way, did you notice 13 checkers was not enough to sustain the draw?

I hope you are a voter in every contest.

Do you have a Mexican problem?

Bill Salot
Bill Salot
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:57 am

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Alex_Moiseyev on Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:32 pm

Bill Salot wrote:Problems are not retricted to only settings that can arise in games.
Interesting statement :lol: I would address you to T. Wiswell problems. "Acceptable" initial setting is important and impresssive and looks always better (in my eyes) than "mixing mosaic" of 31 pieces on the board !
User avatar
Alex_Moiseyev
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Tue May 01, 2012 12:03 am

Hola Mr Salot, maybe that is the problem of the problem, too many checkers, I would love to see how it started to get to that point having 13....
I had voted in the contests, I dont have a mexican problem....or american or brazilian or whatever! jejeje
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Bill Salot on Wed May 02, 2012 5:43 pm

Irma,
Your vote is appreciated.

Alex,
I presume you won't vote for any of the problems in Contest #4 because none of them are acceptable to you. Please realize that if we did not accept them, there would be no Contest #4. Maybe, if you enter an acceptable problem in a future contest and win with it, our composers will then seek to emulate your precedent. If and when a composer makes a change in problem style, it will be because he or she chooses to do so, not because of any rules on acceptable appearance. Let the composers be guided by the voting public, not by the opinion of any individual, alive or deceased. I am learning from their votes. I believe you can too.
Bill Salot
Bill Salot
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:57 am

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Wed May 02, 2012 11:52 pm

Thank you Mr. Salot! :-)
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Fri May 04, 2012 12:31 am

Me again.... I think there is a problem in the problems page because I could vote twice, I just wanted to see what problem was winning and pooon, it said: thanks for voting, BUT this was the second time.... :oops:
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Bill Salot on Fri May 04, 2012 6:34 pm

Irma, Thanks for the alert.
Are you sure you pushed a voting button a second time? The voting buttons should have disappeared after your first vote.
Jason thought he had duplicate voting blocked after he deleted extra votes in Contest #2.
I'll ask him to look into it again.
Bill Salot
Bill Salot
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:57 am

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Sat May 05, 2012 9:05 pm

I am very sure Mr Salot, it was offering me to vote and i had done it already....
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Jason Solan on Sun May 06, 2012 3:30 pm

Irma, Sorry you were able to vote twice.
Voting is tied to an IP Address. For most people, that doesn't change often, unfortunately yours must've changed since you originally voted. I was able to look up the IP Address you made your last post from and eliminated the vote to the contest for it.

I've also added a button to see the results if you've already voted, but the system doesn't recognize that you've voted. This should help reduce double voting.
Jason Solan
Site Admin
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Mon May 07, 2012 12:21 am

Jason, I went to the contest, it was offering me to vote or asking me if i already voted and said yes and saw the results.....but didnt check if i could vote again....
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Irma Sierra on Mon May 07, 2012 12:23 am

I closed the window, oppened it again and could see the results, not the option for voting...tomorrow i check again....
just lady.......
User avatar
Irma Sierra
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:48 am
Location: M E X I C O

Re: CONTEST #4

Postby Eric Strange on Mon May 07, 2012 2:06 pm

I do think something else needs to be done for voting. Tying to an IP address and blocking proxies is not very reliable. Anyone could connect to VPN's and vote multiple times.

Cable IP's do not tend to change often but DSL tends to change IP's everytime the modem is unplugged and plugged back in.

If someone is tethering their cell phone to a computer to get internet. That IP will change every time you re-tether the connection.

There has to be another way to handle this, that is more reliable or at least more difficult to cheat.
User avatar
Eric Strange
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Colorado

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

class=