Do you know that rapid tiebreak games were writtent in my match contract with Ron King in 2003 ?JohnAcker wrote:Just floating this idea: if two challengers draw a match, could the title just be vacant until the next WQT?
Sergio, this is great and exactly what we are trying to achieve !!!sergio wrote:If King had known about this rule, maybe he would have changed his strategy.
I agree that world title games can't be play with less than 15-20 minutes.MostFamousDane wrote:In my opinon we shouldn't go lower than that but In all likelihood the match is decided then - if not we could use one of the other proposals
Yes and no I am totally OK to introduce new rule in 3-moves (my idea !), but current 3-moves cycle 2012-2013 already started even though we didn't have any events yet.sergio wrote:So we would already be able to use it next year if a tied match happened again.
15-20-30 minutes is OK in my eyes ... checkers is sport after all. I am OK with anything except coin and boxing hahaChexhero wrote:If we are going to decrease time for games played I think putting it down to 20 minutes per person is not enough, not at the grandmaster level. I would go no less than 45 minutes per person.
YES.George Hay wrote:Mr. Alex, do you really want the World Champion to be forced to play in the QT in case of a tied match?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest