I move we limit all future ACF rating lists to ACF-sanctioned events (and perhaps WCMs hosted by the ACF and including ACF members), and limit all WCDF rating lists to international events.
I think a bigger issue with removing non-ACF players from the ratings list is that the ratings were already calculated with them included. So take an example of King playing in the Irish Open. While he may be an ACF member, not everyone who played there was.
Would the right thing to do be to only calculate games between ACF members or to not include the tournament at all?
Either way it's in the past and his rating would've already been adjusted from the tournament. Removing non-ACF players from the list after the fact is a start, but it's not the same as removing them from the source, which would require recalculation.
Alex_Moiseyev wrote:Sune, I saw your comments to my 11 man ballot World Match with Tim Laverty and if I didn't say anything, this probably means - nothing much to add !
If you were looking for compliments - you have them
Chexhero wrote:Famous Dane - I was not implying that you haven't made any contributions to checkers. I have no clue who you are or what you have done. I'm glad to see that you do contribute. All I know is that I am just trying to help and people, just like you, seem content to tear me down. You came at me calling my contributions a waste. I was simply stating that if you dont like my contributions, oh well. If you see something you think needs improvement make an effort to improve it, but don"t tear others down for thier contributions. I see a lot of people on this forum complain that we need to increase appreciation and participation in checkers, especially to keep ACF going. However, very few act on what they say. I don't have a lot of money to donate so I donate my time and effort. I have spent a lot of time and hard work on these ratings and am insulted that people would call it a waste. Who cares how a person contributes as long as they make the effort. Criticizing me doesn't do anyone any good. Its certainly not going to encourage others to contribute if they see that when you do you get insulted.
I always and strongly beleive that ratings for GAYP events shall not be processed together with 3-moves and 11 man ballot. This is apple and oranges. It is well known that the percentage of draws in GAYP games is much bigger and any wins are more exceptional and honorable. Calculating rating for GAYP events seriously screwed numbers.
OK, no problems, impact is minimum and fun is growing We should help our small and weak brother ha-haChexhero wrote:there are barely any GAYP tournaments anymore.
Chexhero wrote:But if you really want my opinion, it seems you are simply stirring the pot. I have deffended myself and my hard work. I am not asking for appreciation for my contribution but I will not allow people to put me down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests